FORKED.gg
FORKED.gg
Version 1 of the Forked.gg white paper is finished and public. It covers the node network and how operators get paid for verified work, the $FORK token model in full, Aegis governance, the DAO Launchpad, FORKcast, the marketplace and the roadmap. It also says plainly what is still unfinished, because a paper that only lists the good parts is not worth reading.
Both files are around 6 MB. The PDF is the one to save or print.
Version 1 is the only version. Every earlier draft that circulated privately is superseded and should not be quoted. If a figure you have seen somewhere does not match this document, this document is the one that counts.
If you only have ten minutes, read the executive summary on page 2, then section 6 on the node network and section 13 on the token model. Those three carry most of the design.
The team holds no portion of $FORK. Its upside is equity in the operating company, so no insider is ever a structural seller of the token. Section 13 sets out what that costs us and why we took the trade.
Binding governance votes are cast per node and never weighted by holdings. Aegis runs the proposal and voting machinery, and smart contracts execute the outcome once a threshold is met. Sections 4 and 8.
Node service revenue splits 65 / 23 / 10 / 2 across the operators who did the work, the company, a buyback leg and the network. Operators take the largest share because they carry the hardware. Section 13.
The first version of FORKcast is points only, with no way to buy in with cash and no way to cash out. That is a wall in the ledger rather than a setting. Section 10.
No token price appears anywhere in the paper. Every figure is stated in the unit it is actually denominated in, and the document converts between them nowhere. There is no worked example and no payback period, by decision, because a projected price is the easiest thing in the world to write down and the hardest to stand behind.
The paper states each of these plainly in its own pages. We are repeating them here so nobody has to go looking, and so the list sits on the public site rather than at page 53.
Found something wrong, unclear, or too good to be true? That is what a public review draft is for. Bring it to the Discord and we will answer it in the open, and if you are right it goes into the next version with the correction visible.
Tell us what we got wrong