FORKED.gg
← Back to forked.gg
FORKED.gg
← Back to forked.gg
Every number behind supply, allocation, vesting, and emissions, with the math that produces it. No hidden buckets, no founder bag, no insider unlock. Plug in your own assumptions and check our arithmetic.
Most token projects carve out a slice for the founders and the core team, often 15 to 20 percent, and call it alignment. We took that line to zero. The Forked.gg team holds no $FORK allocation at all. The only way anyone on the team makes money is through equity in the operating company, so the team only wins if the company builds something real that lasts. There is no founder bag to unlock, no team cliff to wait out, no quiet wallet that sells into every rally.
That single decision is what lets the rest of the design stay clean. Sell pressure on $FORK comes from one place, operators claiming the rewards they earned for verified work, and the whole system is engineered to absorb that with real demand from paying customers. When you read the allocation chart below, the zero next to Team is the most important figure on it. The token serves the ecosystem, and nothing is skimmed off the top to fund a payroll. We are honest about the one indirect line that does exist: the 16.3 percent Protocol Treasury is company-held, and the company is owned by the team through equity, so treasury value reaches the team the long way around, through building a real business rather than through a token rake. We would rather state that plainly than imply the team touches nothing.
Forked.gg was previously Helix Games, and its token was $LIX. The rebrand re-issues the token as $FORK under a smaller, cleaner supply. Legacy holders are honored in full. The table below sets the two side by side, on verified on-chain facts for $LIX and the current proposal for $FORK.
| Dimension | $LIX · Helix (legacy) | $FORK · new |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Snapshot taken. No longer supported. Do not buy, sell, or transfer. | New token, deploying on BNB Chain. Snapshot balances swap automatically. |
| Maximum supply | 50,000,000,000 (50B) | 1,000,000,000 (1B), fixed, no minting beyond the cap |
| Supply minted | 17.81B at the 23 Jun 2026 snapshot (35.6% of cap); the rest still issuable | Released only on a published schedule from pre-allocated buckets |
| Conversion | Not applicable | 50 LIX : 1 FORK (1 LIX = 0.02 FORK), proportion-preserving |
| Team / insider allocation | ~51.6% of minted supply sat in company and insider multisigs | 0% to the team. Equity only. |
| Holder structure | 368 holders, ~84% held by contracts and multisigs | Each legacy holder keeps the exact same percentage of supply |
| Base emission rate | 0.15% / day of the remaining latent pool | 0.08% / day base, declining, topping up only what real revenue does not cover |
| Demand backing | None. No liquidity pool, $0.00 on-chain market. | 65% of node-service revenue recycles into open-market $FORK buys |
| Unsold token sale | ~4.76B LIX unsold seed-round pool sat minted | Burned, not carried forward into $FORK |
| Chain | BNB Smart Chain (BEP-20) | BNB Chain first, chain-flexible by design |
The fixed 1B supply splits into two layers: legacy Helix obligations honored off the top, and a new economy designed fresh underneath. The donut and table below account for every token. Team sits at zero.
How the new-economy slices are computed: legacy obligations (Layer A, ~184M) come off the top first, leaving ~816M for the new economy (Layer B), which is weighted 38 / 30 / 20 / 12.
The old 50B LIX cap maps onto the new 1B FORK cap. That is a 50-to-1 redenomination, so every holder converts at 50 LIX to 1 FORK and keeps the exact same percentage of supply, with no dependence on any price. Each claim below is a real on-chain balance divided by 50.
† Patrick Bergman and Jason Brink are advisors to Forked.gg but do not receive any token allocation.
Layer A totals ~184M FORK (18.4%). The node-reward line is pinned to the 23 Jun 2026 on-chain snapshot of the NodeOperatorsReward pool (5.869B LIX), which is already minted supply, not new issuance. The pool grows by roughly 18M LIX per day while Helix emission still runs, so this line re-pins at the moment $FORK deploys. Every figure here is reproducible from BscScan.
Two different release mechanisms keep supply from hitting the market all at once: a six-month linear vest on all legacy redemptions, and an earn-or-vest pacing on operator rewards. Both are shown below with their formulas.
Every redeemed balance, the node-reward pool and community wallets alike, vests over the same six months under one identical rule. Anyone can emergency-claim early: they receive whatever has vested to that point and forfeit the entire unvested remainder, which recycles to the Emissions Reserve. The earmark stays at full par, so no one is shortchanged on value, only on the speed of a panic exit.
Foundation node rewards stack up as an earned balance while the node runs. When the operator chooses to switch to vesting, that accumulated chunk releases linearly over 30 days, the node must stay online the whole time, and no new base rewards accrue during the vest. Only one chunk vests at once, and an operator cannot earn and vest at the same time. Time spent vesting is time not earning, which paces how fast rewards reach the market and lets each operator set their own cadence.
Pay for specific paid work, hosting particular content, a metered workload, an oracle or CDN service, is not subject to the earn-or-vest switch. An operator being paid to host specific content keeps earning it while their foundation rewards sit accumulated or vesting, so real paid service work never gets blocked by the foundation pacing.
We are happy to build with suggestions from our community. This one came from Free in our Discord, and it is a sharp question: if people claim and vest tokens, can someone with early sight of those numbers trade ahead of everyone else?
Community suggestion, credited to Free in the Forked.gg Discord.
[...] As for vesting after claiming rewards... will the token amounts people claim and are currently vested be public knowledge? Scenario: a large amount of tokens get claimed. Who has access to that insider info that can use it to their advantage and dump before those tokens can be sold?
View the original message in DiscordThe answer is that there is no insider view to exploit. Every claim and every vesting balance settles on-chain, so the amounts, the schedules, and the day-by-day unlocks are public to everyone at the same time. Nobody at Forked.gg gets an early or private feed of this data. To make that easy to see rather than something you have to dig out of a block explorer, the panel below ships with launch.
Read straight from the migration and vesting contracts, refreshed on-chain. The figures below are sample data, not real balances.
Next 30 days, day by day. Vesting is linear, so there is no single unlock date. Every day a slice of every position crosses into fully unlocked.
Each bar is one day. Green grows as amber converts into it, because vesting is linear and a little matures every day. The amber bumps are new claims entering vesting. If a holder emergency-claims a position, it leaves the projection: the amber comes off and the green it would have become never appears, so the chart always reflects what can actually reach the market.
A public API endpoint will return these same figures so exchanges, market makers, and any community member can verify the numbers independently or build their own dashboards on top. This endpoint is on the build list and ships alongside the on-chain migration and vesting contracts.
Emission is a declining, adaptive top-up, not a fixed firehose. Each day the network emits a small fixed percentage of the latent reserve that is left, so the draw shrinks every single day on its own. Real service revenue backfills operator pay, and the reserve becomes a bootstrap subsidy that tapers as the business grows.
Emissions Reserve remaining, 310M → 64M over five years
A fixed rate on a shrinking base is self-retiring
| Year end | Reserve left | Drawn that year |
|---|---|---|
| Start | 310M | · |
| Year 1 | 226M | 84M |
| Year 2 | 165M | 61M |
| Year 3 | 120M | 45M |
| Year 4 | 87M | 33M |
| Year 5 | 64M | 23M |
The split is locked: every day's emission goes to node operators, with a small DAO Grant Pool slice on top governed through Aegis. The company takes 0% of emissions; it funds itself from the 35% fiat cut it keeps on node-service revenue. We are not going to publish a chart or a forecast telling you what a node will earn, because per-node pay depends on how many nodes are running and on the token price at the time, and both of those move.
Operator sell pressure is offset by real outside demand. Customers pay fiat for node services, the company keeps 35% to run operations, and recycles the other 65% into open-market $FORK buys that flow back to the operators who did the work. The company only ever buys, never sells.
That 65% recycle is roughly five times the structural buy pressure of the old 12% buy-burn model. Across five years the modeled structural demand is about 2,860M $FORK of buys, and the net token flow turns positive around month 11. The mechanism rests on a real service business rather than on emissions, which is the entire point of the redesign.
Every figure on this page is a proposal for review and is provisional until the new $FORK contract is deployed on-chain and independently audited. On-chain $LIX facts are verified and reproducible from BscScan; the $FORK allocation, vesting schedules, and emission curve are a working design subject to legal review before any external use. Modeled node-income and demand figures assume a flat reference price and are not a promise of value or yield. $FORK and node licenses may lose value or become worthless. Nothing here is financial, legal, tax, or investment advice, or an offer to buy any asset. This page re-pins when the contract deploys. See the full Terms & Conditions.